a1831bb940
Back when this was first written, dma_supported() was somewhat of a murky mess, with subtly different interpretations being relied upon in various places. The "does device X support DMA to address range Y?" uses assuming Y to be physical addresses, which motivated the current iommu_dma_supported() implementation and are alluded to in the comment therein, have since been cleaned up, leaving only the far less ambiguous "can device X drive address bits Y" usage internal to DMA API mask setting. As such, there is no reason to keep a slightly misleading callback which does nothing but duplicate the current default behaviour; we already constrain IOVA allocations to the iommu_domain aperture where necessary, so let's leave DMA mask business to architecture-specific code where it belongs. Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| acpi | ||
| asm-generic | ||
| clocksource | ||
| crypto | ||
| drm | ||
| dt-bindings | ||
| keys | ||
| kvm | ||
| linux | ||
| math-emu | ||
| media | ||
| memory | ||
| misc | ||
| net | ||
| pcmcia | ||
| ras | ||
| rdma | ||
| rxrpc | ||
| scsi | ||
| soc | ||
| sound | ||
| target | ||
| trace | ||
| uapi | ||
| video | ||
| xen | ||
| Kbuild | ||